Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Critical Interpretations of the Story: “The Cask of Amontillado”.



Paper Name:  The American Literature

Paper No: 10


NO:  27

Guided By: Heenaba Zala

Submitted To:  Department of English Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University.




Critical Interpretations of the Story: “The Cask of Amontillado”.
Introduction:
          Edgar Allan Poe was American writer and he was more famous for his short stories. He is well known for his tales of ratiocination, his fantastical horror stories and his genre founding detective stories. Edgar Allan Poe was born in 19th January 1809 in Boston, Massachusetts, United States and He was died in 7th October 1849. Poe and his works influenced literature in the United States and around the world, as well as in specialized fields, such as cosmology and cryptography. Poe and his works appear throughout popular culture in literature, music, films and television. Poe was also known as a writer of fiction and became one of the first American authors of 19th century to become more popular in Europe than in the United States. These are the some Tales written by Edgar Alan Poe:
                                             
v  “The Black Cat”
v  “The Cask of Amontillado”
v  The Fall of the House of Usher”
v  “The Gold Bug”
v  “The Tell Tale Heart”
v  “The Masque of the Red Death”
v  “The Oval Portrait”

                      
“The Cask Of Amontillado” Written by Edgar Allan Poe. This story has been almost universally referred to as Poe’s most perfect short story. In has often been considered to be one of the world’s most perfect short stories. Furthermore, it conforms to and illustrates perfectly many of Poe’s literary theories about the nature of the short story: That is, it is short and can be read at one sitting, it is a mood piece with every sentence contributing to the total effect, it is a completely unified work and while it is seemingly simple, it abounds in ironies of many kinds. Finally, every line and comment contributes to the totality or unity of effect that Poe sought to achieve.
“The Cask of Amontillado” is the Story about Two friends and trust between them and how one friend kill his other friend for his Property. Main character of the Story is Fortunato. This story starts with these lines. These lines spoken by Fortunato’s friend Montresor:
“The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could, but when he ventured upon insult I vowed revenge. You, who so well known the nature of my soul, will not suppose, however, that gave utterance to a threat. At length I would be avenged this was a point definitely, settled but the very definitiveness with which it was resolved precluded the idea of risk. I must not only punish but punish with impunity. A wrong is unredressed when retribution overtakes its redresser. It is equally unredressed when the avenger fails to make himself felt as such to him who has done the wrong”.
With the help of these lines we can understand the deep desire of that friend that how he was feels in security from his friend Fortnato and his properties. This story’s plot is quite simple. The first - person narrator,whom we later discover to be named montresor. Announces immediately that someone named Fortunato has injured him repeatedly and has recently insulted him.Montresor can stand no more; he vows revenge upon Fortunato. The reminder of the story deals with Montresor’s methods of entrapping Fortunato and effecting his revenge upon the fortunate Fortunato know of his hatred. Accordingly, one evening during carnival time, a time when much frivolity and celebration that he would be taking place, Montresor set his fiendish, mad plan into motion with full confidence that he would never be discovered. In fact, at the end of the story, we are certain that his atrocity will never be discovered in the story.
            Poe is Master I create the fear in reader and in audience’s mind. In this story he explains it very well. Upon a first reading of The Cask of Amontillado we might be tempted to view Montresor simply as an Unreasonable, cold blooded murdere. He presents us with only a vague understanding of his motivations and his pretense of good will and careful manipulation of Fortunato indicates the care with which he has planned Fortunato’s death. We again have a classic case of poe’s unreliable narrator, whose guilt and occasional irrationality prevents him from presenting himself truthfully to the reader. However, closer inspection shows that Montresor displays a particularly black sense of humor, with which he amuses both himself and the horrified reader as he leads Fortunato into his trap. He informs the audience of his intentions before he begins the story of his last encounter with Fortunato and Poe employs both verbal and dramatic irony to convey the darkness of the story.
            In The Cask of Amontillado Verbal irony occurs between Fortunato and Monstresor. When the literal meaning of what the speaker says contrasts heavily with the speaker’s actual message. For example, Poe gives the victim the name of Fortunato. This may mean “Fortunate” in Italian, but adds an extra element of cynical humor to Fortunate’s jovial and unsuspecting character. Montrsor’s dialogue makes particular use of verbal irony, since he is aware that Fortunato has no idea what awaits him and thus will totally misinterpret Montresor tells his victim, “My Dear Fortunato, You are luckily met”. That time Fortunato  interprets these words to mean that Montresor is fond of him and is only happy to see him because Montresor can  now carry out his murderous plans. Furthermore, the Fortunato’s fate. Other examples of verbal irony include Montresor’s showing of the trowel to Fortunato to prove he is a Mason Montresor is about to become a mason by inspiring Fortunato, but he is not a Freemason.
My Dear Fortunato, you areluckily met. How remarkably well you are looking today. But I have received a pipe of what passes for Amontillado, and I have my doubts.” “How?” said he “Amontillado, A pipe? Impossible! And in the middle of the carnival!” “I have my doubts,” I replied; “and I was silly enough to pay the full Amontillado price without consulting you in the matter. You were not to foun, and I was fearful of losing a bargain.” “Amontillado!” “As you are engaged, I am on my way to Luchresi. If any one has a critical turn it ishe. He will tell me”
“Luchresi cannot tell Amontillado from Sherry.|”
“And yet some fools will have it that his taste is a match your own.”
                            
Because both the audience and Montresor are aware of the unfortunate Fortunato’s impending death, dramatic Irony also plays a role in the comedy of horrors of “The Cask of Amontillado.” Dramatic irony is the result of the disconnect that occurs when a character namely, Fortunato is not aware of the true meaning of his own actions. The very setting of the ironic, in that Montresor has chosen the jovial carnival season to enact his murder because no one will be at his estate to witness the crime. Fortunato himself is dressed in a jester’s outfit and the jingling of his jester’s bells remind us of the atmosphere of happiness and cheer outside the catacombs. Later, as they drink the Medoc, Fortunato drinks to the dead and buried, not realizing that he is about to join them and Montresor drinks to Fortunato’s health.
“Come,” I said, with decision, “we will go back; your health is precious. You are rich, respected, admired, and beloved; you are happy, as once I was. You are a man to be missed. For me it is no matter. We will go back; you will be ill, and I cannot be responsible. Besides, there is Luchresi” “Enough,” He said; “the cough’s a mere nothing; it will not kill me. I shall not die of a cough.” “True – True,” I replied; “and, indeed, I had no intention of alarming you unnecessarily – but you should use all proper caution. A draught of this Medoc will defend us from the damps.
“Drink,” I said, presenting him the wine.
            In these lines we can see that how Montresor creates the intrigue against the Fortunato, and how Fortunato trap in that intrigue and he suffers a lot and at the end he was died. The key to the humor in the story is that despite Montresor’s sardonic jabs, Fortunato does not realize the extent of his danger until he has been chained to the granite and even then he remains too drunk to completely comprehend what has taken place for some time. After repeatedly insulting Luchesi for his lack of intellect, Fortunato shows himself to be even more the dupable fool. Because of Fortunato’s drunken and therefore unsuspicious condition, we do not know if Fortunato would have been any cleverer in his normal state. Neverthless, by the end of the story Montresor shows himself to be both the more villainous and the more intelligent being. As he tells Fortunato he comes from a family with a motto and a coat of arms that indicates a long tradition of revenge and he ignores any pangs of great sickness by blaming the damp and shutting Fortunato into the burial ground of his avenging family.


“Proceed,” I said; “Herein is the Amontillado. As for Luchresi”
“He is an ignoramus,” interprutted my friend, as he stepped unsteadily Forward, while I followed immediately at his heels. In niche, and finding an instant he had reached the extremity of the niche, and finding his progress arrested by the rock, stood stupidly bewildered. A moment more and I had fettered him to the granite. In its surface were two iron staples, distant from each other about two feet, horizontally. From one of his waist, it was but the work of a new second to secure it. He was too much astounded to resist. With drawing the key I stepped back from the recess.
“Pass your hand,” I said, “Over the wall; you cannot help feeling the nitre. Indeed, it is very damp. Once more let me implore you toreturn. No? Then I must Positively leave you. But I must first render you all the little attentions in my power.”
“True,” I replied; “the Amontillado.” As I said these words I busied myself among the pile of bones of which I have before spoken. Throwing them aside, I soon uncovered a quantity of building stone and Mortar. With these Materials and with the aid of my trowel, I began Vigorously to wall up the entrance of the niche.
            These lines are the Examples of the Verbal irony in this story. The clues to the basically ironic nature of the story can be seen in many separate details which suggest that the truth is just the opposite of the surface appearance. The central irony lies in Montresor’s coat of arms--which depicts a large human foot crushing a serpent whose fangs are embedded in the heel--and his family motto: No one harms me with impunity. There is irony also in Montresor’s criteria for a successful revenge: that a wrong is unredressed when retribution overtakes its redresser or when the avenger does not make clear that he is acting out of revengeory.
            The reader should realize, as Montresor does not, that despite his cleverness and irony, Montresor is an inhuman monster and something of a madnam Montresor’s tone throughout is jocose. Repeatedly, he baits Fortunato by playing on his vanity, suggesting that Luchesi can judge the wine as well, pretending to be his concerned friend, giving his enemy chance after chance to escape. The vaults are too damp, Fortunato has a cough, his health is precious and they should turn back. With fore knowledge, Montresor observes that Fortunato will not die of a cough and drinks to his long life. Montresor interprets his family’s coat of arms signifying, he says that no one injures him with impunity, a warning that Fortunato has ignored When he will use to wall up his enemy. Thus, Montresor plays cat and mouse with his victim. After chaining his enemy, He implores him to return then says he must render him “all the little attention in my power,” and proceeds to the masonry. Clearly, he savors every moment of his murderous revenge. When Fortunato begins to scream, Montresor reveals his own madness. Unsheathing his rapier, he thrusts about with it and then responds by echoing and surpassing the cries of his victim. At the end, he returns to his jocose tone, observing that his heart grew sick on account of “the dampness of the catacombs,” and concluding, fifty years later, “In pace requiescat”:                                                                      
            Poe’s use of color imagery is central to his questioning of Montresor’s motives. His face covered in a black silk mask. Montresor represents not blind justice but rather its gothic opposite blessed revenge. In contrast, Fortunato dons the motley-colored costume of the court fool, who gets literally and tragically fooled by Montresor’s masked motives. The color schemes here represent the irony of Fortunato’s death sentence. Fortunato, Italian for “the fortunate one,” faces the realization that even the carnival season can be murderously serious. Montresor chooses the setting of the carnival for its abandonment of social order. While the carnival usually indicates joyful social interaction, Montresor distorts its merry abandon, turning the carnival on its head. The repeated allusions to the bones of Montresor’s family that line the vaults foreshadow the story’s descent into the underworld. The two men’s underground travels are a metaphor for their trip to hell. Because the carnival, in the land of the living, does not occur as Montresor wants it to, he takes the carnival below ground, to the realm of the dead and the satanic.
The final moments of conversation between Montresor and Fortunato heighten the horror and suggest that Fortunato ultimately—and ironically—achieves some type of upper hand over Montresor. Fortunato’s plea, “For the love of God, Montresor!” has provoked much critical controversy. Some critics suggest that Montresor has at last brought Fortunato to the pit of desperation and despair, indicated by his invocation of a God that has long left him behind. Other critics, however, argue that Fortunato ultimately mocks the “love of God,” thereby employing the same irony that Montresor has effectively used to lure him to the crypts. These are Fortunato’s final words, and the strange desperation that Montresor demonstrates in response suggests that he needs Fortunato more than he wants to admit. Only when he twice screams “Fortunato!” loudly, with no response, does Montresor claim to have a sick heart. The reasons for Fortunato’s silence are unclear, but perhaps his willing refusal to answer Montresor is a type of strange victory in otherwise dire circumstances.

“He! He! He! – he! He! He!- yes, the Amontillado. But is it not getting late? Will not they be awaiting us at the palazzo, the lady Fortunato and the rest? Let us be gone.” “yes” I said, “let us be gone.” “For the love of God, Montresor!” “yes,” “I said, “For the love of God!”
But to these words I hearkened in vain for reply. I grew impatient. I called aloud “Fortunato” No answer. Icalled again “Fortunato!” No answer still. I thrust a torch through the remaining aperture and let it fall within. There came forth in return only a jingling of the bells. My heart grew sick; it was the dampness of the catacombs that made it so. I hastened to make an end of my labour. I forced the last stone into its position; I plastered it up. Against the new masonry I re erected the old rampart of bones. For the half of a century no mortal has disturbed them. In pace requiescat!
As in many of Poe's short stories, Montresor is the first-person narrator and appears to be speaking to a specific audience. However, whereas we can suppose that the narrator of "The Tell-Tale Heart" is speaking to some authority figure in order to prove his sanity, in "The Cask of Amontillado" we know very little about Montresor's audience or motivations. The only hint we have comes in the first paragraph, where he implies that his audience already knows something of Montresor's thoughts and personality. The account occurs some fifty years after the event, suggesting that a somewhat older Montresor was never discovered and has not greatly changed his opinion that the crime was justified. Montresor has shown himself to be risk averse, so his audience must be someone that he trusts, perhaps a confessor or a relative. Possibly he is at the end of his life, and now that he can no longer face any severe consequences, he has decided to tell his story. The ambiguity of the circumstances and Montresor's escaping of justice lend a sinister tone to his story, which is further backed by Poe's extensive use of irony.

Conclusion:
So we can say that the theme is revenge. It can be looked at as revenge as a driving force behind a person going so far as to commit a murder or as twisting the mind of a person who is vengeful to begin with. Such a person might be so obsessed with vengeance that he imagines reasons to obtain it.RevengeActually, themes cannot be simply summed up into one word, like "pride" or "revenge." The theme for Poe's "The Cask of Amontillado" would sound something more like, "Vengeance conquers even the highest of men," or "Revenge drives humans to great lengths," etc.The major theme is one of revenge and what the obsession with revenge can do to a person. In this story, Montresor's family prides itself on leaving no insult unavenged. Montresor's obsession with this has perhaps made him imagine that Fortunato has insulted his family just so that he, Montresor, has something to exercise his family's pride on.
The theme can also be one of pride being a person's undoing. Fortunato is proud of his ability as a judge of wines and it is his pride that leads him to his doom. Montresor's pride in his family motto may very well have led him into committing a totally unnecessary murder, by reason of his imagining the so-called injuries and insults of Fortunato.

My Profiles:




No comments:

Post a Comment